More Americans are voluntarily quitting their jobs as they become increasingly confident about business conditions — a trend that Janet Yellen, the next Federal Reserve chairman, is monitoring.
Almost 2.4 million U.S. workers resigned in October, a 15 percent increase from a year earlier, based on seasonally adjusted data from the Department of Labor. These employees represent 56 percent of total separations, the 13th consecutive month above 50 percent and highest since April 2008. November figures are scheduled to be released Jan. 17. (…)
The quits ratio is highly correlated with how Americans feel about the job market and is especially helpful because it separates behavior from intentions, showing “what people are doing, not what they say they’ll do,” Colas said. “Voluntarily leaving one’s position requires a fundamental level of confidence in the economy and in one’s own personal financial story.” The ratio in November 2006, about a year before the recession began, was 58 percent.
The share of Americans who say business conditions are “good” minus the share who say they are “bad” rose in December to the highest in almost six years: minus 3 percentage points, up from minus 4.2 points the prior month, based on data from the Conference Board, a New York research group.
Job seekers also are more optimistic about the hiring environment. Sixty-three percent of callers to a job-search-advice help line Dec. 26-27 said they believed they could find new employment in less than six months, up from 55 percent a year ago, according to Challenger, Gray & Christmas Inc., a human-resources consulting company. (…)
The number of planned layoffs at U.S. firms plunged by 32 percent in December to the lowest monthly total in more than 13 years, a report on Thursday showed.
Employers announced 30,623 layoffs last month, down from 45,314 in November, according to the report from consultants Challenger, Gray & Christmas, Inc.
The last time employers announced fewer job cuts was June of 2000, when 17,241 planned layoffs were recorded.
The figures come a day ahead of the closely-watched U.S. non-farm payrolls report, which is forecast to show the economy added 196,000 jobs in December. (…)
The December figure fell 6 percent from a year earlier, when planned layoffs totaled 32,556, and marked the third straight month that announced workforce reductions dropped year over year. (…)
The Federal Reserve Board reported that consumer credit outstanding increased by $12.3 billion (6.1% y/y) during November following an unrevised $18.2 billion October gain. The latest monthly gain was the weakest since April.
Usage of non-revolving credit increased $11.9 billion (8.2% y/y) in November. Revolving credit outstanding gained $4.3 billion (1.0% y/y) in November.
Markit Eurozone Sector PMI: Automobiles & auto parts posts its best quarterly performance since Q1 2011
Despite recent growth being high in the context of historical survey data, automobiles & auto parts still maintains some forward momentum heading into the New Year. New orders increased sharply and to the greatest degree in three years in December, leading to a substantial build-up of outstanding business. Job creation, which has until now been muted relative to the trends in output and new business, therefore looks set to pick up.
Output, adjusted for seasonal swings, increased 1.9 percent from October, when it fell 1.2 percent, the Economy Ministry in Berlin said today. Economists predicted a gain of 1.5 percent, according to the median of 32 estimates in a Bloomberg News survey. Production climbed 3.5 percent from a year earlier when adjusted for working days.
German orders rose by 2.1% in November, rebounding from a 2.1% drop in October. The headline trend shows solid growth with three-month growth at a 12.7% annual rate, up from a 6.2% annual rate over six-months and a 6.8% annual rate over 12-months. The strength is led by foreign demand.
Foreign orders rose by 2.2% in November from a 2.2% drop in October but also logged a 6.3% increase in September. As a result, foreign orders are rising at a 27.1% annual rate over three-months, up from a 12.8% annual rate over six-months, and a 9% annual rate over 12-months.
In contrast, domestic orders rose by 1.9% in November, unwinding a 1.9% drop in October. However, domestic orders also fell by 0.9% in September. As a result, the trend for domestic orders is poor. It is not just weaker than foreign orders – it is poor. Domestic orders are falling at a 3.8% annual rate over three-months following a 1.9% annual rate drop over six-months and a 3.9% annual rate gain over 12-months. The domestic sector is in a clear deceleration and contraction.
The CAAM said sales of both passenger and commercial vehicles totaled a record 21.98 million units, up 14% from a year earlier, the fastest pace since 2010. Passenger vehicles led the way, with sales up 16% to 17.93 million units.
Sales gain in December quickened due in part to local consumers’ habit of spending ahead of the Lunar New Year, which falls in the end of January this year. Auto makers shipped 2.13 million vehicles to dealers, up 18% from a year earlier. Among the total, sales of passenger vehicles were 1.78 million units, up 22% on year.
Even as China’s economy displayed clear signs of a slowdown, consumers bought new vehicles, motivated by some cities’ pending restrictions on car purchases to alleviate traffic congestion and air pollution. Within hours after the northern city of Tianjin announced a cutback on new license plates last month, thousands of residents rushed to buy cars. Some used gold necklaces as collateral, said local media.
CAAM said it expects gains to continue this year, though at a slower pace. The association projected a rise of 8%-10% for the overall auto market, to about 24 million units, and as much as an 11% gain for passenger vehicles, to nearly 20 million units.
“China’s auto market is still at the period of rapid expansion and growth has gradually shifted to small-sized cities where demand is significant,” said Shi Jianhua, deputy secretary-general at the CAAM.
The consumer-price index rose 2.5% in December from a year earlier, slower than the 3.0% year-over-year rise in November, the National Bureau of Statistics said Thursday.
In the December price data, food remained the key contributor to higher prices, rising 4.1% year on year in December. But that was down from the 5.9% rise the previous month. Nonfood prices were up 1.7% in December, compared with November’s 1.6% gain.
But in a continued sign of weak domestic demand, prices at the factory level fell once again, declining for the 22nd consecutive month. They were down 1.4% in December, falling at the same rate as in November.
Stripped of food prices, inflation edged up to 1.7% YoY from 1.6% in November.
The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development said Thursday the annual rate of inflation in its 34 developed-country members rose to 1.5% from 1.3% in October, while in the Group of 20 leading industrial and developing nations it increased to 2.9% from 2.8%.
The November pickup followed three months of falling inflation rates, but there are indications that it will prove temporary. Figures already released for December showed a renewed drop in inflation in two of the world’s largest economies, with the euro zone recording a decline to 0.8% from 0.9%, and China recording a fall to 2.5% from 3.0%.
Federal Reserve officials were largely in agreement on the decision to begin winding down an $85 billion-per-month bond-buying program. As they looked to 2014, they began to focus more on the risk of bubbles and financial excess.
- Some … expressed concern about the potential for an unintended tightening of financial conditions if a reduction in the pace of asset purchases was misinterpreted as signaling that the Committee was likely to withdraw policy accommodation more quickly than had been anticipated.
- Several [Fed officials] commented on the rise in forward price-to-earnings ratios for some small cap stocks, the increased level of equity repurchases, or the rise in margin credit.
Something the Fed might be facing sooner than later:
When your predictions are confounded, do you carry on regardless? Or do you stop, think and consider changing course? Such is the remarkable recovery in the UK economy since the first quarter of last year that the Bank of England is now facing this acute dilemma.
Just five months ago, the bank’s new governor pledged that the BoE would not consider tightening monetary policy until unemployment fell to 7 per cent so long as inflationary pressures remained in check. (…)
The question is what the BoE should now do. Worst would be to show guidance was entirely a sham by redefining the unemployment threshold, reducing it to 6.5 per cent. Carrying on regardless of the data is no way to run monetary policy. Instead, the BoE should be true to its word and undertake a thorough consideration of a rate rise alongside its quarterly forecasts in its February inflation report. (…)
I have been posting about swinging pension charges in recent months. Most companies determine their full year charge at year-end which impacts their Q4 results.
Rising interest rates and a banner year for stocks could lift reported earnings at some large companies that have made an arcane but significant change to the way their pension plans are valued.
Rising rates and a banner year for stocks could lift earnings at some large companies that have made an arcane but significant change to the way their pension plans are valued.
Companies including AT&T Inc. and Verizon Communications Inc. could show stronger results than some expect when they report fourth-quarter earnings in coming weeks. They and about 30 other companies in the past few years switched to “mark-to-market” pension accounting to make it easier for investors to gauge plan performance.
With the switch, pension gains and losses flow into earnings sooner than under the old rules, which are still in effect and allow companies to smooth out the impact over several years. Companies that switch to valuing assets at up-to-date market prices may incur more volatility in their earnings, but it offers a more current picture of a pension plan’s health and its contribution to the bottom line.
In 2011 and 2012, that change hurt the companies’ earnings, largely because interest rates were falling at the time. But for 2013, it may be a big help to them, accounting experts said, a factor of the year’s surge in interest rates and strong stock-market performance.
“It’s going to account for a huge rise in operating earnings” at the affected companies, said Dan Mahoney, director of research at accounting-research firm CFRA.
Wall Street analysts tend not to include pension results in their earnings estimates, focusing instead on a company’s underlying businesses. That makes it hard for investors to know what the impact of the change will be. Some companies may not see a big impact at all, because of variations from company to company in how they’ve applied mark-to-market changes. (…)
Some mark-to-market companies with fiscal years ended in September have reported pension gains. Chemical maker Ashland Inc. had a $498 million pretax mark-to-market pension gain in its September-end fourth quarter, versus a $493 million pension loss in its fiscal 2012 fourth quarter. That made up about 40% of the Covington, Ky., company’s $1.24 billion in operating income for fiscal 2013. (…)
Not all mark-to-market companies will see gains. Some such companies record adjustments only if their pension gains or losses exceed a minimum “corridor.” As a result, Honeywell International Inc. says it doesn’t foresee a significant mark-to-market adjustment for 2013, and United Parcel Service Inc. has made similar comments in the past.
Moody’s adds: US Corporate Pension Funded Ratios Post Massive Increase in 2013
At year-end 2013, we estimate pension funding levels for our 50 largest rated US corporate issuers increased by 19 percentage points to 94% of pension obligations, compared with a year earlier. In dollar terms, this equates to $250 billion of decreased underfundings for these same issuers. We expect this reduction to be replicated across our entire rated universe. These improved funding levels will result in lower calls on cash, a credit positive.
Combined profit at the six largest U.S. banks jumped last year to the highest level since 2006, even as the firms allocated more than $18 billion to deal with claims they broke laws or cheated investors.
A stock-market rally, cost cuts and a decline in bad loans boosted the group’s net income 21 percent to $74.1 billion, according to analysts’ estimates compiled by Bloomberg. That’s second only to 2006, when the firms reaped $84.6 billion at the peak of the U.S. housing bubble. The record would have been topped were it not for litigation and other legal expenses. (…)
The six banks’ combined litigation and legal expenses in the nine months rose 76 percent from a year earlier to $18.7 billion, higher than any annual amount since at least 2008. The costs increased at all the firms except Wells Fargo, where they fell 1.2 percent to $413 million, and Morgan Stanley (MS), which reported a 14 percent decline to $211 million. (…)
Legal costs that averaged $500 million a quarter could be $1 billion to $2 billion for a few years, Dimon told analysts in an Oct. 11 conference call. The firm is spending also $2 billion to improve compliance by the end of 2014, he said last month. (…)
This is one of the main narratives at present, now that earnings multiples have expanded so much. The other popular narrative is the acceleration of the U.S. economy which would result in accelerating earnings, etc., etc… Here’s Liz Ann Sonders, Senior Vice President, Chief Investment Strategist, Charles Schwab & Co., Inc.
It’s also possible valuations could continue to expand even if earnings growth doesn’t meet expectations. There is a direct link between valuation and the yield curve. A steep curve (long rates much higher than short rates); which we have at present and are likely to maintain; suggests better growth and easy monetary policy. This environment typically co-exists with rising valuation.
Low inflation is also supportive of higher multiples. Why? Earnings are simply more valuable when inflation is low; just like our earnings as workers are worth more when inflation is taking less of a bite out of them.
Lastly, as noted in BCA’s 2014 outlook report: In a liquidity trap, where interest rates reach the zero boundary, the linkage between monetary policy and the real economy is asset markets: zero short rates act to subsidize corporate profits, drive up asset prices and encourage risk-taking. Over time, higher asset values begin to stimulate stronger consumption and investment demand—the so-called “wealth effect.” We could be at the very early stages of a broad transition from strengthening asset values to better spending power by businesses and consumers. Global capital spending has begun to show signs of a rebound; while US consumers are beginning to borrow and spend again.
A few remarks on the above arguments:
The yield curve can steepen if short-term rates decline or if long-term rates rise. The impact on equities can be very different. My sense is that the curve, which by the way is presently very steep by historical norms (chart from RBC Capital), could steepen some more for a short while but only through rising long-term yields. This is not conducive to much positive valuation expansion, especially if accompanied by rising inflation expectations which, normally, follow economic acceleration.
The next chart plots 10Y Treasury yields against the S&P 500 Index earnings yield (1/P/E). The relationship between the two is pretty obvious unless you only look at the last Fed-manipulated 5 years. Rising rates are not positive for P/E ratios.
Low inflation is indeed supportive of higher multiples as the Rule of 20 clearly shows. What is important for market dynamics is not the actual static level of inflation but the trend. Nirvana is when the economy (i.e. profits) accelerate while inflation remains stable or even declines. Can we reasonable expect nirvana in 2014?
The wealth effect was in fact Bernanke’s gambit all along. And it worked. But only for the top 20% of the U.S. population. What is needed now is employment growth. Can we get that without triggering higher inflation?
Miss Sonders reminds us that
This bull market is now the sixth longest in S&P 500 history (of 26 total bull markets). As of year end 2013, it’s run for 1,758 days, with the longest ending in 2000 at 4,494 days. It is the fourth strongest in history; up over 173% cumulatively as of year-end 2013.
The South African rand sank to a fresh five-year low Thursday, as a rise in the dollar, fueled by strong U.S. jobs data, kept emerging market currencies under pressure.
The Turkish lira also suffered, closing in on its all-time low against the dollar reached earlier in the week. The rand and the lira are widely considered to be among the most vulnerable emerging market currencies, as both South Africa and Turkey are reliant on foreign investment flows to fund their wide current account deficits.