SOFT PATCH WATCH
EUROZONE RETAIL SALES REMAINED WEAK IN JANUARY AFTER A BLEAK CHRISTMAS
Yesterday, I reported on the very severe decline in retail sales in December. To repeat, especially since I have yet to find a mainstream media with this important factual news (even uber-bear ZeroHedge missed it):
Total retail volume dropped 1.6% MoM in December in the EA17. Over the last 4 months, retail volume is down 1.8%, that is a 5.4% annualized rate! Core sales volume dropped 1.8% in December and is down 1.5% since September (-4.6% annualized). Real sales dropped 2.5% in Germany (-2.4% in last 4 months), 3.6% in Spain (-6.0%), 1.0% in France (-1.2%).
These numbers were from Eurostat. Today, Markit released its January Eurozone Retail PMI. Read their release considering that it is based on surveys conducted in Germany, France and Italy. The overall reading is up just above the 50 mark, but only because Germany had a solid January following a dismal December. France and Italy continued to experience poor sales trends, even after a very soft December.
January eurozone retail PMI® data from Markit showed the first rise in sales for five months. And although only slight, the increase was the fastest since April 2011. Germany was the driver of growth, posting its most marked improvement in trade since August. France’s drag on the currency union’s overall performance meanwhile diminished as sales there fell at a much slower pace than in December, whereas Italy saw another solid decrease.
The Markit Eurozone Retail PMI registered at a 33-month high of 50.5 in January. Although indicative of only marginal growth, this latest index reading was nevertheless a marked improvement from 47.7 in December. Sales were still notably lower compared with the situation one year ago, however.
Stocks of goods for resale at eurozone retailers rose to the greatest extent in more than a year-and-a- half in January. With spending on resale items having fallen on the month, data suggested that this was in part due to sales being lower-than-expected. Indeed, retailers confirmed that they had generally underperformed relative to their targets.
This is very worrying. The all-important December sales were terrible and January was only better in Germany (thanks in part to mild weather). Retailers are thus stuck with high unsold inventories which will negatively impact manufacturing in coming months. Given that U.S. retailers also seem to be overstock post Christmas, manufacturers of consumer goods are probably globally feeling the pain at this moment.
(…) Kohl’s Corp (KSS.N) on Thursday said sales in January were “significantly” lower than expected as shoppers stayed away. The department store chain reported a 2 percent decline in quarterly comparable sales, those online and at stores open at least a year, despite a good start to the holiday season.
Analysts expect a group of nine retailers that report these results on a monthly basis to show a 2 percent rise in comparable sales for January, well below the 4.9 percent growth of a year earlier, according to Thomson Reuters.
Some chains managed to register sales gains, but those came either at the expense of rivals or profit margins.
Costco Wholesale Corp (COST.O) said its same-store sales rose 5 percent in January, with fresh food a popular item for its bargain-seeking members. That contrasted with a quarterly decline at Wal-Mart Stores Inc’s (WMT.N) Sam’s Club chain.
Victoria’s Secret parent L Brands Inc (LB.N) posted a much bigger-than-expected jump of 9 percent in comparable sales. But the company said its profit margin was “significantly” lower after it had to deepen discounts and hold sales events longer. The retailer expects only modest sales gains in February.
The consumer mood seemed to sour last month. The Thomson Reuters/University of Michigan’s consumer sentiment index slipped to 81.2 in January from 82.5 in December. Confidence fell acutely among households with annual incomes below $75,000. (…)
Cato Corp (CATO.N), a chain of low-priced clothing stores; Fred’s Inc (FRED.O), which sells general merchandise; and Stein Mart Inc (SMRT.O), an off-price clothing retailer, all blamed Mother Nature for declines in comparable sales.
Sterne Agee analyst Charles Grom said higher home heating bills could crimp consumer spending “well into April.”
The disappointing sales results follow recent poor reports from many stores. Baird analyst Mark Altschwager estimated that comparable sales at J.C. Penney Co Inc (JCP.N) fell 3 percent last month. And last week, Wal-Mart said its profit for the fourth quarter ended January 31 would come at or slightly below its forecast.
Getting shoppers into stores, a source of major concern for retailers during the holiday season, did not seem to improve last month. Walgreen Co (WAG.N) managed to report a jump in comparable sales, but the drugstore chain said traffic fell 2.2 percent.
Meanwhile, ECB Keeps Rate Unchanged The European Central Bank kept interest rates on hold, resisting calls for additional stimulus to guard against threats to a nascent recovery in the euro zone
“The reason for today’s decision not to act has really to do with the complexity of the situation that I described and the need to get more information,” Draghi said in Frankfurt today after the ECB left interest rates on hold. “We are willing, and we are ready to act.”
“We remain firmly determined to maintain the high degree of monetary accommodation and to take further decisive action if required,” Draghi said. “We firmly reiterate our forward guidance. We continue to expect the key ECB interest rates to remain at present or lower levels.”
“I tried to give you a sense of how complex is the picture which would explain why before taking any decision today we would wait,” Draghi said. “Things may get better, or they may stay where they are, or they may get worse.”
They are also driving blind in Europe. At least, Draghi admits it.
US retailers feel the food aid squeeze Big grocers report falling sales because of welfare cuts
The neediest Americans will be hurt by an $8.6bn cut to food aid in a bill that was approved by Congress this week and will be signed into law by President Barack Obama on Friday. But another set of welfare beneficiaries will lose out too: big grocery retailers. (…)
At Walmart, which is better known for penny-pinching, analysts estimate that around 20 per cent of shoppers use food stamps. The company said last week that sales at its US stores had fallen in the past quarter partly due to $11bn of food stamp cuts that began in November and will extend over three years. For a household of four, that reduced monthly payments by $36 to $668, according to equity analysts at Cowen & Co.
The cut approved this week, which is spread over a decade, works out at an annual reduction of $860m. It will shrink benefits for 850,000 households – or about 4 per cent of all recipients – by an average of $90 a month, according to the Congressional Budget Office.(…)
At Target, 17 per cent of shoppers use food stamps – known as the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program – and at Costco the figure is 13 per cent, says Cowen & Co. (…)
The very fact that this is happening in the USA is incredible!
World food prices fell in January to a 19-month low, as costs for everything from sugar to grains slid amid ample global supplies, the United Nations’ Food & Agriculture Organization said.
An index of 55 food items dropped to 203.4 points last month from 206.2 in December, the Rome-based FAO wrote in an online report today. The index is down 4.5 percent from a year earlier and is at the lowest level since June 2012, as costs of grain, sugar, vegetable oils and meat fell, with only dairy prices rising.
More Men in Their Prime Are Out of Work More than one in six men ages 25 to 54 don’t have jobs. It’s partly a symptom of a U.S. economy slow to recover from the worst recession in 75 years and also a chronic condition that shows how technology and globalization are transforming jobs faster than many workers can adapt.
(…) Some are looking for jobs; many aren’t. Some had jobs that went overseas or were lost to technology. Some refuse to uproot for work because they are tied down by family needs or tethered to homes worth less than the mortgage. Some rely on government benefits. Others depend on working spouses.
Having so many men out of work is partly a symptom of a U.S. economy slow to recover from the worst recession in 75 years. It is also a chronic condition that shows how technology and globalization are transforming jobs faster than many workers can adapt, economists say.
The trend has been building for decades, according to government data. In the early 1970s, just 6% of American men ages 25 to 54 were without jobs. By late 2007, it was 13%. In 2009, during the worst of the recession, nearly 20% didn’t have jobs.
Although the economy is improving and the unemployment rate is falling, 17% of working-age men weren’t working in December. More than two-thirds said they weren’t looking for work, so the government doesn’t label them unemployed.
For women, the story is different. In the 1950s, only about a third of women ages 25 to 54 had jobs. That rose steadily until the 1990s, and then leveled off for reasons that aren’t clear. At last tally, about 70% were working; 30% weren’t.(…)
(…) For Brazil, fewer exports of its cars, auto parts, food and manufactured goods to one of its major trading partners, Argentina, stands to further hold back its already slowing economy. Uruguay, whose economy is more dependent on Argentina’s, is concerned about a run on Argentine banks and a drop in tourism from its neighbor.
Venezuela, economists say, has started to selectively default—failing to pay European airlines, American oil service companies and Colombian food exporters, among others, as it struggles with fast-depleting reserves. (…)